Participants of the Creative Society(CS) Project have been actively involved for over five years. However, in recent years, they have faced persecution from anti-cult organizations in Russia and Ukraine. What have they done to warrant bans in some countries? I decided to investigate. By exploring several forums, I noticed that the CS Project covers a wide range of topics, with a strong focus on climate and the need for uniting people and scientists. They also address related and even very unusual topics, such as future technologies.
I was particularly interested in the Free Energy Generator (FFG) topic and the related issue of “clean energy”. This topic is extremely relevant today, both because of rising energy prices and climate change. In fact, solving the issue of access to cheap and clean energy will help us solve many other problems. The UN also speaks of this: in the report “Unity in Science 2023”, it states that solving the problem of cheap and clean energy will help achieve most of the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals), namely:
- SDG 2: Zero hunger
- SDG 3: Good health and well-being
- SDG 4: Quality education
- SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation
- SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production
- SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
- SDG 9: Industry, innovation, and infrastructure
- SDG 11: Sustainable cities and communities
- SDG 13: Climate action
- SDG 14: Life below water
- SDG 15: Life on land
Indirectly, achieving SDG 7 also contributes to achieving SDG 1: No poverty and SDG 5: Gender equality.
Visiting the “Creative Society” website, I discovered that the independent platform unites volunteers from 180 countries, including scientists, researchers, and specialists. The fact that the site is available in 63 languages already testifies to the international nature of the project. The website offers a large number of articles and video materials. The main activities of the project include scientific research and analysis (mainly on climate and environmental topics), as well as informational activities. Much attention is given to interviews with scientists, including topics like “free energy” and working FFG.
Why do I think FFG, unlike “green energy”, can help us solve the problem? There are many reasons, here are a few:
- Green energy (such as wind and solar) depends on weather conditions, which is a significant drawback for areas requiring uninterrupted electricity. For example, wind farms operate only 25-35% of the time, while solar panels only 10-25%.
- About 27% of electricity is lost during transmission.
- Low efficiency. The capacity factor for wind power plants is only 20%.
- Waste disposal issues. Solar panels generate 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than nuclear power plants. For instance, if over the next 25 years, solar and nuclear power plants produced the same amount of energy, solar waste would occupy an area equivalent to 16 kilometers high (two Everests), while nuclear waste would reach only the height of the Leaning Tower of Pisa (52 m).
- Space required for installation. Installing wind turbines and solar panels requires large areas, especially for large systems, which can be problematic in densely populated areas.
- Vulnerability of “green energy” to rapidly changing climates.
Unlike solar panels and wind turbines, FFG is compact and autonomous; it can be installed anywhere, on cars, ships, or planes. It does not depend on weather and climate, it can be used both in deserts and at the poles, requires no wires, and has no transmission losses.
This topic needs to be thoroughly studied and developed. The CS Project is one of those supporting the achievement of all SDGs and offering concrete solutions to many crises and problems facing humanity.
